They shot Charlie Kirk

Show me what they found in pa. Should be easy with the huge amount of evidence.
Truth? You are posting opinions from anti Trump people. They are opinions b greene. Not truth.
 
Hahaha love being called bgreen !
Our Presidential election isn’t based on “opinion” ……it’s based on a secure process consisting of both:
1. Popular vote
2. Electoral College
It’s a Constitutional process and exceptionally secure
In 2020, Joe Biden won both and had 306 electoral votes / Trump 232

You can google and listen to the tape of Trump trying to force Georgia Republican Law Maker to come up with more votes.
The official refused to cheat, and told Trump we did the recount - you don’t have the votes.

You can be loyal to the facts, or loyal to the lies .
 
oteps said:
Yeah. Bgreene would say the same. Nothing was looked into in pa.
Click to expand...
Suggest you do your homework / investigation before “ assuming” or just following whatever Trump claims

……”Investigations into voting fraud are routine and necessary to ensure election integrity. While legitimate cases of fraud and irregularities have been uncovered and prosecuted, these are typically isolated instances involving a small number of ballots.

The outcomes of these cases have not supported the broader, unfounded claims of widespread fraud designed to overturn election results”
 
Ostep ….,, Trump really did a number on you……you just assume his claims and other conspiracy theories no matter how much REAL EVIDENCE by HONEST Americans provide ? !!!!!!
 
Trump didn't claim it. The governor said we will not look into anything in pa. No homework or investigations here in pa. If u can come up with something let me know.
 
Deepdrop2* said:
Hahaha love being called bgreen !
Our Presidential election isn’t based on “opinion” ……it’s based on a secure process consisting of both:
1. Popular vote
2. Electoral College
It’s a Constitutional process and exceptionally secure
In 2020, Joe Biden won both and had 306 electoral votes / Trump 232

You can google and listen to the tape of Trump trying to force Georgia Republican Law Maker to come up with more votes.
The official refused to cheat, and told Trump we did the recount - you don’t have the votes.

You can be loyal to the facts, or loyal to the lies .
Click to expand...


A rose by any other name is still a rose.
 
oteps said:
Trump didn't claim it. The governor said we will not look into anything in pa. No homework or investigations here in pa. If u can come up with something let me know.
Click to expand...



Check the accurate information even though you prefer following whatever Trump claims
  • Saying the governor “refused to look into” fraud suggests inaction despite credible evidence. In fact, much of what was requested by those demanding investigations was either already addressed, legally rejected, or not supported by credible proof.
  • Courts and other independent bodies did look at various claims; many were adjudicated (rejected, dismissed) because they didn’t hold up under scrutiny.
  • Some requests were for very broad or sweeping disclosures (e.g. personal identifying information of millions of voters); these raised legal/privacy barriers. That often becomes part of the “refusal” narrative, but usually because of legal limits rather than an outright refusal to consider anything.
 
Deepdrop2* said:
Oteps …..you refer to the so called “ left “ as mentally ill .

Trump is likely the most bias President in our history. As he said ref the 2020 Capitol attack “ those are our people” …..

You seem smart enough to know this, question being strong enough to admit it.

View attachment 13797
Click to expand...
1757683916379-png.13797


Everything you post is the truth, you said. Right? And you posted the above, right?

Are you totally unaware that the US House UNANIMOUSLY passed a resolution in Melissa Hortman's honor? (In case you don't understand what UNANIMOUSLY means, it means that ALL voted in favor of it, Democrats AND Republicans.) And that it universally condemned political violence?

Compare to the measure honoring Charlie Kirk that 58 Democrats voted AGAINST, 38 voted PRESENT, and 22 did not vote at all in any fashion. As if that wasn't bad enough, some of the Democrats got up and gave speeches condemning and defaming him in session.

We will await your retraction, and observe that "Occupy Democrats" posts lies for the furtherance of their cause.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top